Comments on: IEEE best paper award

By: Keith Tayler

Keith Tayler — Tue, 01 Jun 2010 15:49:25 +0000

The shirt was not that bad – or perhaps it was.

By: Ross Anderson

Ross Anderson — Sat, 29 May 2010 20:12:51 +0000

Yes, the transactions we put through were genuine forgeries!

Ross

By: Mike Bond

Mike Bond — Sat, 29 May 2010 12:29:26 +0000

The new photo looked a bit too dark, so using some photoshop magic I brightened up the foreground a bit, apologies if it looks a bit amateurish but at least you can see our faces now. Nothing else is photoshopped, we did all the stuff in the paper for real... didn't we?

By: Marco Ramilli

Marco Ramilli — Tue, 25 May 2010 17:33:26 +0000

Well done guys.
I’ve just finished to read it. It’s awesome ! I really enjoyed the reading. Hope to see some follow up.

By: Keith Tayler

Keith Tayler — Thu, 20 May 2010 17:18:43 +0000

Well done. Great paper – not sure about that shirt.

By: GiveFreedomToLabs

GiveFreedomToLabs — Thu, 20 May 2010 01:38:31 +0000

Keep your head up!
We all are proud of you and waiting for updates in your research. By the way, my personal opinion is the same as IEEE.
“Cambridge Computer Laboratory Security Group” is the best in the world sui generis!

cheers

By: Mike Bond

Mike Bond — Wed, 19 May 2010 19:53:19 +0000

Hi Ben, thanks a lot

I’ve just discovered Steven has updated the old link to the paper to point at the new version. So you should be able to find the updated one here:

http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/research/security/projects/banking/nopin/oakland10chipbroken.pdf

The substantive new section is section IX “Response” on pages 10-11.

cheers,

Mike

By: Ben

Ben — Wed, 19 May 2010 17:05:29 +0000

Congratulations guys!

By the way, is the final version of the paper available yet?

By: rob

rob — Wed, 19 May 2010 13:35:22 +0000

Congratulations!

By: Nik

Nik — Wed, 19 May 2010 08:30:58 +0000

Congratulations; it’s an excellent paper (but then again so is most of the output of the Cambridge labs; Prof Wilkes must be proud