<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Latest on security economics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lightbluetouchpaper.org/2007/08/19/latest-on-security-economics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lightbluetouchpaper.org/2007/08/19/latest-on-security-economics/</link>
	<description>Security Research, Computer Laboratory, University of Cambridge</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 10:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: nitpick</title>
		<link>http://www.lightbluetouchpaper.org/2007/08/19/latest-on-security-economics/#comment-23696</link>
		<dc:creator>nitpick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 12:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lightbluetouchpaper.org/2007/08/19/latest-on-security-economics/#comment-23696</guid>
		<description>"ot even a DVD"
"allocate scare resources"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;ot even a DVD&#8221;<br />
&#8220;allocate scare resources&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: not bitter or anything</title>
		<link>http://www.lightbluetouchpaper.org/2007/08/19/latest-on-security-economics/#comment-23694</link>
		<dc:creator>not bitter or anything</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 10:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lightbluetouchpaper.org/2007/08/19/latest-on-security-economics/#comment-23694</guid>
		<description>Hmmm.  "Women value security more than sex” does not imply "women value security more than men do".

Besides to some people "security" probably means a scrounging opportunity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm.  &#8220;Women value security more than sex” does not imply &#8220;women value security more than men do&#8221;.</p>
<p>Besides to some people &#8220;security&#8221; probably means a scrounging opportunity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: giafly</title>
		<link>http://www.lightbluetouchpaper.org/2007/08/19/latest-on-security-economics/#comment-23683</link>
		<dc:creator>giafly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 17:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lightbluetouchpaper.org/2007/08/19/latest-on-security-economics/#comment-23683</guid>
		<description>Reportedly, women value security more than men do, so they should be the core market. Making "security mechanisms" that women find harder to use does not seem like good business sense.

"Women value security more than sex" and other anecdotal comments via Google.
http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&#38;q=%22women+value+security%22&#38;btnG=Search&#38;meta=</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reportedly, women value security more than men do, so they should be the core market. Making &#8220;security mechanisms&#8221; that women find harder to use does not seem like good business sense.</p>
<p>&#8220;Women value security more than sex&#8221; and other anecdotal comments via Google.<br />
<a href="http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&amp;q=%22women+value+security%22&amp;btnG=Search&amp;meta=" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&amp;q=%22women+value+security%22&amp;btnG=Search&amp;meta=</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
