<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Electoral Commission releases e-voting and e-counting reports</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lightbluetouchpaper.org/2007/08/02/electoral-commission-releases-e-voting-and-e-counting-reports/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lightbluetouchpaper.org/2007/08/02/electoral-commission-releases-e-voting-and-e-counting-reports/</link>
	<description>Security Research, Computer Laboratory, University of Cambridge</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 21:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: foursgiant</title>
		<link>http://www.lightbluetouchpaper.org/2007/08/02/electoral-commission-releases-e-voting-and-e-counting-reports/comment-page-1/#comment-31028</link>
		<dc:creator>foursgiant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 21:04:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lightbluetouchpaper.org/2007/08/02/electoral-commission-releases-e-voting-and-e-counting-reports/#comment-31028</guid>
		<description>Hylton Red House Estate Sunderland
The electoral registers for Sunderland North contains incorrect
voter registration numbers printed in the columns alongside voters
names, one particular period from 1958 to 1961 shows that these
numbers cannot be common human error as during this period the
housing estate was covered by two separate electoral wards and
both of these wards show the same and also similar errors in the
voters registration numbers for this one particular estate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hylton Red House Estate Sunderland<br />
The electoral registers for Sunderland North contains incorrect<br />
voter registration numbers printed in the columns alongside voters<br />
names, one particular period from 1958 to 1961 shows that these<br />
numbers cannot be common human error as during this period the<br />
housing estate was covered by two separate electoral wards and<br />
both of these wards show the same and also similar errors in the<br />
voters registration numbers for this one particular estate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clive Robinson</title>
		<link>http://www.lightbluetouchpaper.org/2007/08/02/electoral-commission-releases-e-voting-and-e-counting-reports/comment-page-1/#comment-23337</link>
		<dc:creator>Clive Robinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 12:55:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lightbluetouchpaper.org/2007/08/02/electoral-commission-releases-e-voting-and-e-counting-reports/#comment-23337</guid>
		<description>For those that would like to see the results of the California review on E-Voting machines etc. Have a look at,

http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/elections_vsr.htm

The review was called for by Secretary of State for California Debra Bowen, it was designed to restore the public's confidence in the integrity of the electoral process. 

The top-to-bottom review of the voting machines certified for use in California in 2007 was to find out if the votes cast by Californians are secure, accurate, reliable, and accessible for reliable audit. Various U.S. security and Cryptro experts where involved with investigations for the review and the results are not particularly promissing...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those that would like to see the results of the California review on E-Voting machines etc. Have a look at,</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/elections_vsr.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/elections_vsr.htm</a></p>
<p>The review was called for by Secretary of State for California Debra Bowen, it was designed to restore the public&#8217;s confidence in the integrity of the electoral process. </p>
<p>The top-to-bottom review of the voting machines certified for use in California in 2007 was to find out if the votes cast by Californians are secure, accurate, reliable, and accessible for reliable audit. Various U.S. security and Cryptro experts where involved with investigations for the review and the results are not particularly promissing&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
